Key Highlights:
- $735,000 Agreement: The State of Tennessee and the Town of Spring will compensate the companies for his or her illegal losses.
- Criminal Vindication: The lawsuit demonstrates the transparent criminal difference between hemp and marijuana.
- Precedent-Atmosphere End result: Sends an impressive message about protective criminal trade pursuits.
[PRESS RELEASE] – NASHVILLE, Tenn., Dec. 18, 2024 – In a landmark agreement that underscores the essential criminal variations between hemp and marijuana, two Tennessee companies will get well $735,000 after regulation enforcement illegally seized their criminal hemp stock, exposing vital gaps in native regulation enforcement’s working out of hashish rules.
On Would possibly 9, 2024, Spring Hill Police Division seized 231 kilos of criminal hemp from Previous Faculty Vapor and SAK Wholesale in Columbia, Tenn.—based totally partially on District Legal professional Brent Cooper’s inflammatory declare that hemp and marijuana are “the identical rattling factor.” These days, that observation has confirmed each legally and financially pricey.
“This agreement is greater than a monetary restoration—it’s a essential observation about regulation enforcement’s duty to grasp and recognize the regulation,” stated Alex Little, legal professional at Litson PLLC. “Hemp is a criminal agricultural product, and companies must now not reside in worry of arbitrary seizures according to lack of awareness.”
The case highlights the continued demanding situations companies face within the hemp trade, the place regulatory confusion can result in devastating financial penalties. Whilst the government have now not admitted wrongdoing, the considerable agreement speaks volumes in regards to the deserves of the companies’ claims.
Litson PLLC is a boutique regulation company fascinated about white-collar prison protection and high-stakes litigation. It is a part of Hemp Legislation Workforce, which supplies regulatory recommendation to hemp companies in Tennessee and throughout america.
